Message-ID: <9264713.1075858656040.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: stacey.bolton@enron.com
To: richard.ring@enron.com
Subject: RE: i'm on a conference call.....
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Bolton, Stacey </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SBOLTON>
X-To: Ring, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rring>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \RRING (Non-Privileged)\EESIRenewableEnergy
X-Origin: Ring-R
X-FileName: RRING (Non-Privileged)1.pst

That would classify as more talent than multi-tasking!  Gee....by reason of deduction rather than telepathy, your vm must have asked if I was on the phone.....
 
Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct 
713-303-2632 cell 
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ring, Richard 
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Bolton, Stacey
Subject: RE: i'm on a conference call.....


Yes I did and I left you a voice mail message.  I thought that your response was a direct answer to the voice mail message.
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bolton, Stacey 
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:41 PM
To: Ring, Richard
Subject: RE: i'm on a conference call.....


didn't you call me?
 
Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct 
713-303-2632 cell 
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ring, Richard 
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:34 PM
To: Bolton, Stacey
Subject: RE: i'm on a conference call.....


Very good!

-----Original Message-----
From: Bolton, Stacey 
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Ring, Richard
Subject: i'm on a conference call.....


I can communicate in this form though....I'm multi-tasking.
Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct 
713-303-2632 cell 
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>
 
 



