Message-ID: <12622829.1075862337922.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:17:58 -0800 (PST)
From: lindy.donoho@enron.com
To: tracy.geaccone@enron.com
Subject: Capacity Subscription Strategy
Cc: steven.harris@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: steven.harris@enron.com
X-From: Donoho, Lindy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LDONOHO>
X-To: Geaccone, Tracy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tgeacco>
X-cc: Harris, Steven </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sharris1>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \SHARRIS1 (Non-Privileged)\Harris, Steven\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Harris-S
X-FileName: SHARRIS1 (Non-Privileged).pst

How does this look?

 

Also, I did change some numbers in the excel spreadsheet:

	The Ignacio to Blanco subscription levels were pulling from the row excluding ROFR capacity in the supporting sheet.  I changed it to be consistent with the other 	capacities (which include ROFR capacity).

	Shelley had made some assumptions about East of Thoreau capacity subscription, such as, the USGT 400,000/d contract would remain subscribed (it doesn't 	have ROFR) and she had included the extension of 2-3 other contracts that don't have ROFR.  These contracts were then dropped after 2005.  I continued the 	extensions through 2006.

	I changed the East of Thoreau capacity to 750,000/d from 850,000/d.

 