Message-ID: <22874577.1075862334233.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:38:59 -0800 (PST)
From: j..porter@enron.com
To: kay.miller@enron.com, bill.rapp@enron.com, maria.pavlou@enron.com
Subject: RE: answer to cpuc protest
Cc: robert.kilmer@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, steve.kirk@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: robert.kilmer@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, steve.kirk@enron.com
X-From: Porter, Gregory J. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GPORTER>
X-To: Miller, Mary Kay </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mkmiller>, Rapp, Bill </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Brapp>, Pavlou, Maria </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mpavlou>
X-cc: Kilmer III, Robert </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rkilmer>, 'fkelly@gbmdc.com', McConnell, Mark </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MMcConne>, Harris, Steven </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sharris1>, Kirk, Steve </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Skirk>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \SHARRIS1 (Non-Privileged)\Harris, Steven\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Harris-S
X-FileName: SHARRIS1 (Non-Privileged).pst

Lets plan on 10:00.  Greg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Mary Kay  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 5:22 PM
To:	Rapp, Bill; Pavlou, Maria
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: answer to cpuc protest

How about 9:30 or 10??MK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: answer to cpuc protest

What's a good time for everyone? I'm open in the morning.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pavlou, Maria  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Miller, Mary Kay; Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: answer to cpuc protest

I think we could wind this up with a quick conference call tomorrow a.m.  Greg and I had some additional thoughts on how to handle the issue that this contract is not for 40% of primary capacity - it is not like an El Paso/Dynegy, Enron or El Paso deal without necessarily getting into the alternate issue of sham transactions.  Also, Kathy R. checked and as of today, IS have not filed a protest.  Maria 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Mary Kay  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Pavlou, Maria; Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: answer to cpuc protest

 Attached are some addtional comments and questions in regard to this answer.  MK

 << File: RP97-288cpucmk.doc >> 





 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pavlou, Maria  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; Miller, Mary Kay; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven
Subject:	answer to cpuc protest

Bill, attached are a few comments/questions on your proposed draft answer, which I thought was excellent.  We might want to discuss some of these questions with the ccs.  Thanks, Maria

 << File: RP97-288cpuc.doc >> 