Message-ID: <2987615.1075860376409.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:58:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mary.hain@enron.com
To: christian.yoder@enron.com, steve.c.hall@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com, 
	james.steffes@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, 
	james.keller@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com, 
	harry.kingerski@enron.com, dennis.benevides@enron.com, 
	tim.belden@enron.com, robert.badeer@enron.com, 
	jeff.richter@enron.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, 
	richard.shapiro@enron.com, roger.yang@enron.com, 
	chris.foster@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, 
	richard.shapiro@enron.com
Subject: Confidential Attorney Client Privilege - Attorney Work Product
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Mary Hain
X-To: Christian Yoder, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Richard Sanders, James D Steffes, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel, James E Keller, Mike D Smith, Harry Kingerski, Dennis Benevides, Tim Belden, Robert Badeer, Jeff Richter, gfergus@brobeck.com, Alan Comnes, Richard Shapiro, Roger Yang, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Chris H Foster, Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Mary_Hain_Aug2000_Jul2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Hain-M
X-FileName: mary-hain.nsf

I have drafted the attached letter denying the Cal ISO's request to send it 
(and the EOB) EPMI and EES' cost information for transactions over the FERC's 
cost cap.  Since I believe we are on very firm ground, my initial inclination 
was to send no response to the ISO's letter, so there would be nothing to 
quote in the press.  However, I drafted this letter at Alan's suggestion for 
purposes of discussion.  We should decide whether to send a letter before 
distributing this draft more widely in-house to discuss how to parse the 
message.