Message-ID: <12058786.1075860478560.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 02:41:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mary.hain@enron.com
To: alan.comnes@enron.com
Subject: Re: RTO West
Cc: james.steffes@enron.com, steve.walton@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: james.steffes@enron.com, steve.walton@enron.com
X-From: Mary Hain
X-To: Alan Comnes
X-cc: James D Steffes, Steve Walton
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Mary_Hain_Aug2000_Jul2001\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: Hain-M
X-FileName: mary-hain.nsf

I wished to review the filing (especially the TOA) and comment along the=20
lines we have before.  Unfortunately, I did not have time to read the filin=
g=20
before leaving for vacation.  I left the filing on my desk.  Hope you had a=
=20
happy holiday.  I don't know if Lysa told you but my mother in law died the=
=20
day before Christmas so I will be taking off Jan. 4 & 5th to attend the=20
memorial on the East Coast.  I'll be checking my E-mails periodically.




Alan Comnes
12/22/2000 12:43 PM
To: "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT=20
Subject: RTO West

I have not read the filings summarized below.

I am assuming we will not be protesting/intervening but will be focusing on=
=20
Phase II.  Any thoughts otherwise?

Alan Comnes


Avista Corporation, the Bonneville Power Administration, Idaho Power Compan=
y,=20
The Montana Power Company, Nevada Power Company, PacifiCorp, Portland Gener=
al=20
Electric Company, Puget Sound Energy, Inc., and Sierra Pacific Power Compan=
y,=20
RT01-35-000. Amended Supplemental Compliance Filing. On December 1, Avista=
=20
Corp., the Bonneville Power Administration, Idaho Power Co., The Montana=20
Power Co., Nevada Power Co., PacifiCorp, Portland General Electric Co., Pug=
et=20
Sound Energy, Inc., and Sierra Pacific Power Co. (collectively, Concurring=
=20
Utilities) file an =01&Amended Supplemental Compliance Filing and Request f=
or=20
Declaratory Order pursuant to FERC's Order No. 2000.  The Concurring=20
Utilities stated that this filing amends a previous filing made on October=
=20
23, 2000, in compliance with Order No. 2000.  They contended that the Octob=
er=20
23 filing provided Stage 1, only a subset of information required to comple=
te=20
the proposal related to the formation of RTO West.  They assert that Stage =
2=20
will include the balance of materials and information needed to complete th=
e=20
RTO West proposal and will be submitted to FERC in Spring 2001. Filing=20
noticed December 15. Protests due January 16, 2001.

