Message-ID: <14732247.1075862046923.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:21:15 -0800 (PST)
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: a..knudsen@enron.com, bobbi.tessandori@enron.com
Subject: RE: our meeting
Cc: lizzette.palmer@enron.com, timothy.callahan@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: lizzette.palmer@enron.com, timothy.callahan@enron.com
X-From: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCASH>
X-To: Knudsen, Sheila A. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sknudse>, Tessandori, Bobbi </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Btessan>
X-cc: Palmer, Lizzette </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lpalmer>, Callahan, Timothy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tcallah>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\Sent Items
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst

I don't think that this is a good idea for her process or any other general process.  

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Knudsen, Sheila A.  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:19 PM
To:	Tessandori, Bobbi; Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Palmer, Lizzette; Callahan, Timothy
Subject:	RE: our meeting

You mean for her process in particular, right? 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tessandori, Bobbi  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Palmer, Lizzette; Callahan, Timothy; Knudsen, Sheila A.
Subject:	our meeting

Michelle,

As an FYI, previously Tim and I had discussed perhaps that Louise should be the one that chooses between T&F and J&G, if it comes to that point.

"Everything comes to those who hustle while he waits."
                                                        -Thomas Edison
Best Regards,
Bobbi
International Human Resources
tel:    713 345 2809
fax:   713 646 5969
work space: EB 3658-b
email: bobbi.tessandori@enron.com
