Message-ID: <5247475.1075862044940.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 14:49:38 -0800 (PST)
From: rick.johnson@enron.com
To: mary.clark@enron.com
Subject: RE: Scripts
Cc: michelle.cash@enron.com, amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: michelle.cash@enron.com, amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com
X-From: Johnson, Rick </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RJOHNSO>
X-To: Clark, Mary </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mclark1>
X-cc: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mcash>, Fitzpatrick, Amy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=AFitzpat>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst

We should take the bonus consideration out of the messages  - Aaron Brown indicates that it is not part of the retention concepts and should not be represented as such.   Rj. 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clark, Mary  
Sent:	Sunday, November 25, 2001 4:41 PM
To:	Johnson, Rick
Subject:	Scripts
Importance:	High

Rick, I noticed that in the A group script the bonus consideration was deleted.  However, it's in the B group script.  What's the deal?

Mary E. Clark
Director, Internal Communications
Phone:  713-853-7325
Fax:  713-853-6790
e-mail:  mary.clark@enron.com