Message-ID: <6671582.1075855356458.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:12:40 -0800 (PST)
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: pam.butler@enron.com
Subject: RE: Def Cover letter/Q&As FYI -Going out today FYI
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCASH>
X-To: Butler, Pam </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pbutler>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Michelle_Cash_Jan2002\Cash, Michelle\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: mcash (Non-Privileged).pst

Do we want to say we will exhaust all available possibilities?  That seems like a huge promise, as there may be some approach that is not reasonable, but would be an available possibility.  I would rather give us our own discretion to do what we deem appropriate to assist in this regard.  What does Mary Jean think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Butler, Pam  
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Def Cover letter/Q&As FYI -Going out today FYI

 << File: deferralplanltrfinal12-7.DOC >>  << File: Final 12-7 def plan Q&As.DOC >> 