Message-ID: <22007190.1075855356215.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 07:37:22 -0800 (PST)
From: neil.davies@enron.com
To: michelle.cash@enron.com
Subject: FW: Employment agreements
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Davies, Neil </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NDAVIES>
X-To: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mcash>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Michelle_Cash_Jan2002\Cash, Michelle\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: mcash (Non-Privileged).pst

Is it ?

LK has signed the main body of the contract but Frevert hasn't. They have both signed the assignment.

Thanks

Neil

-----Original Message-----
From: Oxley, David 
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 9:06 AM
To: Davies, Neil
Subject: RE: Employment agreements


Yes. But my understanding is that both she and mark signed the assignment to ena. Isn't that enough?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)